Comments grab moon cake with a plug-in why so many people are sympathetic – Sohu review vy canis majoris

Comment: use the plug-in grab fired cakes why so many people sympathize with the Sohu comments know quite a few people may have called the tiger bites the woman, also hope that the security staff not only fired, can be put on a single technology breakthrough award of small red flowers. What they want is not the real rules, but the rules in their own favorable direction to explain. The Mid Autumn Festival, a well-known Internet companies to engage in an intranet cheap to buy moon cake, a staff of four security department to panic buying moon cake, wrote a script, with the help of technology, multi brush 124 box sales at the cost price of moon cake, was found and was expelled from the day. This caused public opinion hot. In the announcement, the company dismissed "this statement is the issue of values," to other employees caused welfare allocation injustice, more importantly, the security department 2 as the platform rules of the defenders, the use of cheating tools touched the red line of credit." Although the dismissal of technical staff admitted the error, but insisted that he was just grab moon cake, there is no reason to rise to the values, integrity, improper profit ah. There are a lot of people say (especially the know), search and use technical loopholes, this is virtuoso, this is the technical personnel of the geek spirit well. People just grab a few boxes of moon cake, but not rob the bank, why bother to expel this step? In fact, this is a matter of great importance, the company’s practice is right. The work will cheat, obtain benefits (although this benefit is very small), is guilty of bad faith taboo; and the company itself is a payment, trading, financial products platform, integrity is very important. In the final analysis, this is a basic professional ethics: can not use the convenience of occupation and work to undermine the rules of fairness. This should be self-evident, as students should not cheat in the exam, scholars should not plagiarize plagiarism, do not sell fake and shoddy. The party has already suffered the consequences of dismissal, no need to say any more. I was just surprised the public values quickly turn against. Remember not long ago, women don’t obey the rules in the wild zoo tiger bites off injured, she suffered damage has been far greater than her negligence, public opinion is still being bitten to injured all over the body. This time, it was the use of technology to undermine the fairness of the rules, which is the character problem, the nature of the more serious, but won a lot of sympathy. Maybe called Tiger biting woman and behind the two dial fired employees, do not completely overlap, but I doubt many people, not only hate the woman was killed by a tiger, also hope that the security staff not only fired, can be put on a single technology breakthrough award of small red flowers. Because they believe that they will no longer have a place to get off the tiger, but understand that they are likely to be in the right opportunity to do not keep professional ethics. What they want is not the real rules, but the rules in their own favorable direction to explain. It is precisely because we do not think that character does not matter, professional ethics does not matter, so plagiarism, fake and shoddy so much, and integrity, but so little. At the beginning of each step, it starts with a little broken rule, maybe a box of moon cakes. Hou Hongbin (special)相关的主题文章: